Iniuria - Delikt des Römischen Rechts

 

Andreja Katančević
Belgrad

 

Sources:

1. Legal sources: the Digest, Gai’s Institutes, Justinian’s Institutes, Fragmenta Vaticana, Collatio Legum Mosaicarum et Romanarum, Paul’s Sentences

2. Non-legal sources: Festus, De Significatu Verborum; Quintus Cornificius, Auctor ad Herenium; Aulus Gellius, Noctes Atticae; Plinius, Historia naturalis; Cicero, De re publica; Plautus, Asinaria; Seneca, De beneficiis.

Some of the questions under investigation:  

1. What was meant by “iniuria alteri facta” in the Law of the Twelve Tables?
2. How did that delict spread to the notion of iniuria discussed by classical jurists?
3. What constitutes the delict of membrum ruptum of the Twelve Tables and what is its relationship with the delict of os   fractum?
4. Did there exist an edictum generale de iniuriis?
5. Was the damage caused by bodily injury included in the notion of damnum iniuria datum before Justinian’s codification, and what motivated the compilers to carry out a reform in that field?

 

Betreuerin:
Dr. Milena Polojac, Universität Belgrad

 

 

 

 

 

geändert am 27. April 2012  E-Mail: Webmastergrotkamp@jur.uni-frankfurt.de

|

| Zur Navigationshilfe