logo-fb03-1

Chair in Qualitative Empirical Research Methods

News

 

Bender_Article_Green_Subsidies

Summary:

While the literature on eco-social policies has grown, limited attention has been paid to subsidies and
how they are connected to different eco-social policies. In short: We believe that the organizations that
benefit from a particular green subsidy will be much more likely to support eco-social policy. We
focused on the most important trade unions & business organizations in Germany & the US. We
collected 93 documents (press releases, minutes of public meetings, & information from web pages)
and additionally, we used 15 interviews with organization representatives and with experts on the IRA.
In Germany: as we had expected green subsidies play an important role in increasing the support of
eco-social policy reforms. All of the most representative business associations & trade unions agree
that green subsidies should be used to manage the transformation process. Important for our other
argument is that the unions support green subsidies because they are only paid to companies in which
collective agreements or other forms of union representation are in place (positive-sum). In the US: we
also show support for green subsidies among American business organizations & trade unions.
Business groups see innovation & green tech gains; unions support them as subsidies are tied to pro-
labor standards (positive-sum effect).

Can the IRA's green subsidies ensure its political survival under Trump? We believe that green
subsidies may very well prove resilient in the long run, thanks to business, labor, Democratic, &
moderate Republican support.
Check out the full article here.


 

The volume “The Application of Political Science Methods in Europe" (published by Springer and edited by Claudius Wagemann and his Siena colleague Luca Verzichelli) summarizes various aspects of the current use of methods in European political science. The idea for this book was developed during Claudius Wagemann's research semester in Siena during the summer 2019. The eleven chapters contain overviews on the use of methods in different European geographic regions and political science sub-disciplines, present recent methodological innovations and ask whether there are (stereo)typically 'female' or 'male' methods. Next to Claudius Wagemann, our team member Benedikt Bender und our former team members Lukas Brenner and Bastiaan Bruinsma were involved as authors. Additionally, numerous student assistants were involved in the coding of the use of methods in political science journal articles.

 

How do organised interests shape welfare state reforms? Together with B.Ebbinghaus we review various political economy approaches to explaining ongoing welfare state reforms. We also discuss the challenges of member mobilisation & influence in times of multiple crisis. Benedikt Bender is very happy to have contributed to this comprehensive Handbook. He is grateful to the editors, Bernhard Ebbinghaus and Moira Nelson, as well as to all colleagues who made this handbook possible.

Bender_article_Welfare_State_Reforms

 

INTERFACED_article_group_picture
On April 29 and 30, 2025, project partners gathered in Budapest for the first in-person meeting of the project, hosted by the Centre for Social Sciences (CSS). This long-anticipated event provided an invaluable opportunity for face-to-face collaboration, constructive dialogue, and strategic planning as the project moves into its next phase.

The formal programme began on Tuesday morning, April 29, with arrival and coffee, followed by welcoming remarks from Boldizsár Megyesi, Director of the Institute of Sociology at CSS. The morning continued with progress reports from each work package, offering a concise overview of developments and accomplishments to date. This was followed by a review of key deliverables, including the dissemination plan and the quality assurance plan.

Late morning sessions featured a focused discussion on the data management plan, guided by our Ethics Advisor. After lunch, the meeting resumed with a session involving the project's Scientific Advisory Board.

In the afternoon, participants turned their attention to the conceptualisation and operationalisation of interfaces, a critical step in linking together the project's various work packages. This session drew upon key documents, including the descriptive exploration of democratic and political participation variables, the draft interfaces manuscript, and a draft truth table.

Later in the day, we met with representatives from our sister projects, ProTest and Trans4Demo, to share updates and explore potential synergies.

On Wednesday, April 30, the meeting resumed with a first session of the day was dedicated to platform recruitment strategies led by the Edgeryders team, sparking thoughtful discussion on engagement methods and data collection.
These two days in Budapest offered a dynamic mix of strategic dialogue, collaborative planning, and community building. The in-person format brought renewed energy to the project and strengthened the bonds among partners, paving the way for continued progress and meaningful impact in the months ahead.